BestDoctorsSydney.info

In our more than seven years of working on these matter, we’re not sure that we’ve come across anything more amazing than these statements from this ABC article.

What is being alleged is that even if the elderly have had top private medical cover for 50 years, it’s no guarantee that they will get into a private hospital, or that if they do, that they they will “get the quality of care that they need,” because private hospitals can’t make enough money out of providing the elderly with the care they need.

Those who may have an interest in such matters may well want to read the article in full.

It’s something we want to go into further as time allows.

info@questionsmisc.info is our email address and questions and feedback are welcome.

If ever there was an example of emails and email responses showing what someone is really like, it’s these.

Clearly, in an effort to boost his very meagre credentials, Dr Daood claims, on his website, to be a Fellow of a very impressive sounding organisation – but it turns out that this very impressive sounding organisation doesn’t even exist!!! You couldn’t get greater confirmation of this than what Dr Daood himself provides on his website – what purports to be a link to this very impressive sounding organisation’s website, is, in fact, a link to the website of an organisation with a very different name that doesn’t have Fellows!!!

And as if this is not bad enough, he has the gall, the cheek and the effrontery, to persist with this claim when we have been writing to him and the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission about it for more than seven months.

And, as if this is not bad enough again, he has the gall, cheek and effrontery, to send us this letter by email, obviously in the belief that it’s an adequate response to any who might be alleging that his claim is false and misleading.

info@questionsmisc.info is our email address and questions and feedback are welcome.

We could just about write a book about Dr Mak and perhaps some day we will.

More than three yeas ago we were first contacted by the lady who provided the first rating on him on the RateMDs.com website, dated 8 Sep 2012. The rating, which you can read for yourself, couldn’t be worse.

But since then, sixteen 10 out of 10 ratings have appeared on him on the same website, (along with two further 2 out of 10 ratings – the lowest they allow,) from which you could easily come to believe that he was the greatest doctor who has ever lived!!!!!!!????? These have resulted in him now being their top ranked Geriatrician in New South Wales!!!!!!!!!???????

But now the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission has caught up with him – see this Media Report dated today, (16 Oct 2015,) indicating that perhaps he may be not such a great doctor after all.

(This in one of the exceedingly rare occasions – about 8 a year, out of the more than a 100 complaints they get a month – in which this Commission has found a doctor to be, perhaps, not such a good doctor, as opposed to finding him or her to have had improper sexual relations, or to have been lax in their prescribing of drugs.

You can read the details of the Professional Standards Committee inquiry yourself, if you wish, by using this link. That’s if you can be bothered.

info@questionsmisc.info is our email address and questions and feedback are welcome.